Saturday, May 24, 2014
Mosajet: Why you shouldn't eat Pork, Ham !! like me..
Mosajet: Why you shouldn't eat Pork, Ham !! like me..: Facts about pork and why is harmful We all know that pork is haraam according to sharee'ah addressed although many Western countries ma...
Why you shouldn't eat Pork, Ham !! like me..
Facts about pork and why is harmful
We all know that pork is haraam according to sharee'ah addressed although many Western countries make of meat and use in the production of animal products, but with so many studies have demonstrated significant and serious damage caused by the pork for human health, through this article, we will view the facts on pork and why is harmful
First: facts about pork
-The pork or its products as sausage, leading to the accumulation of harmful cholesterol in the arteries, which can lead to clogged arteries and serious diseases as heart disease, diabetes, osteoporosis, asthma, Alzheimer 's, ed.
Pig intestines are similarly as the waste Fund where it feeds it boil anything matched by either waste or sewage or output of other animals, worms and other animals and meat.
-Meat and lard absorb toxins such as sponge, therefore it is Sam 30 times more than beef or venison.
-When eating beef or venison it takes 8-9 hours to be digested, which means that the toxins absorbed slowly in the body and is filtered by the liver, while pork is digested within 4 hours only, which means that the toxins move and are absorbed in the body quickly.
-Pigs do not sweat like other animals are known to race is an accountable and flush toxins out of the body and toxins are deposited inside the body and pork.
-Some farmers put snakes for pigs to feed them because they will not be affected by these snakes.
-After slaughtering the pig the meat full of worms and insects in very little time.
-Pork is high and a very large number of parasites such as worms, tapeworms, and there is a safe cooking ensure the eradication of all these parasites of pork.
-Pork on a very large proportion of fat up to twice the quantity of beef.
-Cows have digestive complex makes them digest all the plants that feed them within 24 hours and purifies the body of toxins while pig digesting things that feed during the 4 hours just so keep the toxins within the body of the pig.
-Carrying hogs about 30 disease which can be transmitted directly to humans.
-The pig does not see worms under the microscope of smallness cause so if you go to the human body turning to gut or muscle or brain and spinal cord, causing severe pain and illness here may be diagnosed as typhoid mistake or arthritis, meningitis or a problem in the gallbladder
II: health problems caused by eating pork
When eating pork poses a serious risk to human health and increase the chances of following diseases:
1. viral diseases
Cause the quantity of parasites that feed the pig as bacteria and other parasites in human viral infection which causes vomiting, diarrhea, fever and abdominal cramping and dehydration, and does not contribute to cook pork here to kill the bacteria or final disposal and these parasites are drug resistant.
2. roundworm
These worms also worm pig is one of the most important damage pork so when eating pork infected with this worm to human gut grow and become large and reproduce and move through the gut into the bloodstream and invade the muscle tissue, according to medical studies may affect the heart and lungs and diaphragm and the brain and the symptoms include convulsions, diarrhea, fever and muscle pain, and abdominal pain.
3. heart disease
Pork contains a very high proportion of harmful saturated fats, which are considered a major factor in the incidence of heart disease, which causes high LDL cholesterol in the body which causes hardening of the arteries and increases the risk of heart disease, it leads to excessive weight and obesity, which directly affects the heart and other organs of the body, the wehzaat includes the cost of pork products either pork or sausage made from pork fat.
4. increases the risk of bladder cancer
Eating large quantities of pork causes increased risk of bladder cancer and this according to the published an article in a medical center cancer andrsnbegamah Texas the pork cooked at high temperatures caused some heterocyclic amine compounds called HCAs that cause increased risk of bladder cancer.
And so it became clear to us the extent of harm caused by eating pork or pork products from
Thursday, May 8, 2014
Mosajet: Baby Boomers’ Retirement Means For the U.S. Econom...
Mosajet: Baby Boomers’ Retirement Means For the U.S. Econom...: Baby Boomers’ Retirement Means For the U.S. Economy The Idea f this study is not discussing the value of value of the elder power resource...
Baby Boomers’ Retirement Means For the U.S. Economy
Baby Boomers’ Retirement Means For the U.S. Economy
The Idea f this study is not discussing the value of value of the elder power resources But to show how is Our society in need of need New Blood injection to our body in order to Increase our youth force to support the increase of aging in our society..Either by Importing the manpower with the right age or encourage Youth to Immigrate to our Land and open Our schools , Jobs to them to blind them and Enrich our Society with their power; Below is a report of to explain my opinion ..thanks for visiting my Blog.
Mohsen Sarhan.
What Baby Boomers’ Retirement Means For the U.S. Economy
The Idea f this study is not discussing the value of value of the elder power resources But to show how is Our society in need of need New Blood injection to our body in order to Increase our youth force to support the increase of aging in our society..Either by Importing the manpower with the right age or encourage Youth to Immigrate to our Land and open Our schools , Jobs to them to blind them and Enrich our Society with their power; Below is a report of to explain my opinion ..thanks for visiting my Blog.
Mohsen Sarhan.
What Baby Boomers’ Retirement Means For the U.S. Economy
For decades, the retirement of the baby boom generation has been a looming economic threat. Now, it’s no longer looming — it’s here. Every month, more than a quarter-million Americans turn 65. That’s a trend with profound economic consequences. Simply put, retirees don’t contribute as much to the economy as workers do. They don’t produce anything, at least directly. They don’t spend as much on average. And they’re much more likely to depend on others — the government or their own children, most often — than to support themselves.
The recession may have delayed the inevitable for a time. The financial crisis wiped away billions in retirement savings, forcing many Americans to work longer than planned. But the stock market has since rebounded, and there are signs that more Americans are at last feeling confident enough to leave the workforce. The labor force participation rate for older Americans — the share of those 55 and older who are working or actively looking for work — has fallen over the past year after rising through the recession and early years of the recovery. Roughly 17 percent of baby boomers now report that they are retired, up from 10 percent in 2010.1
Now that the wave has begun, nothing is likely to stop it. The Census Bureau on Tuesday released a pair of reports that show just how dramatic an impact the graying of the population will have in coming decades.
Nearly a quarter of Americans were born between 1946 and 1964, the typical definition of the baby boom generation. That’s more than 75 million people. In their heyday, the boomers were an unprecedented economic force, pushing up rates of homeownership, consumer spending and, most important of all, employment. It’s no coincidence that the U.S. labor force participation rate — the share of the adult population that has a job or is trying to find one — hit a record high in the late 1990s, when the boomers were at the peak of their working lives.
It’s been downhill ever since. The participation rate hit a 36-year low last month, and while there are multiple reasons for the decline, the aging of the baby boom generation is a dominant factor. In 2003, 82 percent of boomers were part of the labor force; a decade later, that number has declined to 66 percent, and it will only continue to fall.
All else equal, fewer workers means less economic growth. One way to measure this is a figure known as the “dependency ratio,” or the number of people outside of working age (under 18 or over 64) per 100 adults between age 18 and 64.2 The higher the ratio, the worse the news: If more of the population is young or old that leaves fewer working-age people to support them and contribute to the economy.
The U.S. dependency ratio has been improving in recent decades, falling from 65 in 1980 to 61 in 2000 to 59 in 2010. But now the trend is set to reverse. By 2020, the Census Bureau estimates, the U.S. dependency ratio will be back to 65; in 2030, it will be 75, the worst since the 1960s and 1970s, when the baby boomers were children.
The dependency ratio is a blunt instrument. Not everyone retires the day they turn 65; indeed, as lifespans lengthen (and pensions decline), more people are working later in life. But only up to a point: Plenty of people work past 65; few work past 85.3 It will be a while yet before baby boomers start turning 85, but more of them will get there than any previous generation. By 2050, more than 4 percent of the population will be at least 85 years old, more than double today’s figure.4
As bad as the U.S. demographics look, things are worse in much of the world. The U.S. has fewer residents over 65, as a share of its population, than most developed countries, and the disparity will only grow in coming decades. In 2050, about 21 percent of the U.S. population will be 65 or older compared to more than 30 percent in much of Western Europe and an incredible 40 percent in Japan. China, as a result of its “one child” policy, faces its own, somewhat different, demographic crisis.
One reason the U.S. is in better shape is its comparatively high rate of immigration. Since people tend to migrate when they are younger, immigrants tend to bring down the age of the population as a whole. Moreover, at least in the U.S., immigrants tend to have a higher birth rate than the native-born population, although the gap has narrowed somewhat in recent years. The future direction of immigration, therefore, makes a big difference to the age breakdown of the U.S. population. The Census Bureau’s demographic estimates are based on a middle-of-the-road projection of future immigration, but the bureau also publishes alternative scenarios. In the “high immigration” scenario, the U.S. has nearly 22 million more working-age residents in 2050 than in the “low immigration” case.
The U.S. also has another trend working in its favor: Baby boomers are retiring just as their children — sometimes known as the “echo boomers” — are entering their prime working years. Boomers are no longer even the largest age cohort; more of today’s Americans were born in the 1980s and 1990s than in the postwar years. As today’s teens and 20-somethings enter the workforce, they will partly offset their parents’ exit. Indeed, for many young people, mom and dad can’t retire soon enough; some experts argue that boomers, by staying in the workforce longer than past generations, are essentially clogging the usual professional pathways, leaving few opportunities for people beginning their careers.
Thanks in part to the echo boomers, the dependency ratio will flatten out by about 2030. Not that long thereafter, the oldest of the echo boomers will begin entering their own retirement years, and the cycle will begin anew.
The recession may have delayed the inevitable for a time. The financial crisis wiped away billions in retirement savings, forcing many Americans to work longer than planned. But the stock market has since rebounded, and there are signs that more Americans are at last feeling confident enough to leave the workforce. The labor force participation rate for older Americans — the share of those 55 and older who are working or actively looking for work — has fallen over the past year after rising through the recession and early years of the recovery. Roughly 17 percent of baby boomers now report that they are retired, up from 10 percent in 2010.1
Now that the wave has begun, nothing is likely to stop it. The Census Bureau on Tuesday released a pair of reports that show just how dramatic an impact the graying of the population will have in coming decades.
Nearly a quarter of Americans were born between 1946 and 1964, the typical definition of the baby boom generation. That’s more than 75 million people. In their heyday, the boomers were an unprecedented economic force, pushing up rates of homeownership, consumer spending and, most important of all, employment. It’s no coincidence that the U.S. labor force participation rate — the share of the adult population that has a job or is trying to find one — hit a record high in the late 1990s, when the boomers were at the peak of their working lives.
It’s been downhill ever since. The participation rate hit a 36-year low last month, and while there are multiple reasons for the decline, the aging of the baby boom generation is a dominant factor. In 2003, 82 percent of boomers were part of the labor force; a decade later, that number has declined to 66 percent, and it will only continue to fall.
All else equal, fewer workers means less economic growth. One way to measure this is a figure known as the “dependency ratio,” or the number of people outside of working age (under 18 or over 64) per 100 adults between age 18 and 64.2 The higher the ratio, the worse the news: If more of the population is young or old that leaves fewer working-age people to support them and contribute to the economy.
The U.S. dependency ratio has been improving in recent decades, falling from 65 in 1980 to 61 in 2000 to 59 in 2010. But now the trend is set to reverse. By 2020, the Census Bureau estimates, the U.S. dependency ratio will be back to 65; in 2030, it will be 75, the worst since the 1960s and 1970s, when the baby boomers were children.
The dependency ratio is a blunt instrument. Not everyone retires the day they turn 65; indeed, as lifespans lengthen (and pensions decline), more people are working later in life. But only up to a point: Plenty of people work past 65; few work past 85.3 It will be a while yet before baby boomers start turning 85, but more of them will get there than any previous generation. By 2050, more than 4 percent of the population will be at least 85 years old, more than double today’s figure.4
As bad as the U.S. demographics look, things are worse in much of the world. The U.S. has fewer residents over 65, as a share of its population, than most developed countries, and the disparity will only grow in coming decades. In 2050, about 21 percent of the U.S. population will be 65 or older compared to more than 30 percent in much of Western Europe and an incredible 40 percent in Japan. China, as a result of its “one child” policy, faces its own, somewhat different, demographic crisis.
One reason the U.S. is in better shape is its comparatively high rate of immigration. Since people tend to migrate when they are younger, immigrants tend to bring down the age of the population as a whole. Moreover, at least in the U.S., immigrants tend to have a higher birth rate than the native-born population, although the gap has narrowed somewhat in recent years. The future direction of immigration, therefore, makes a big difference to the age breakdown of the U.S. population. The Census Bureau’s demographic estimates are based on a middle-of-the-road projection of future immigration, but the bureau also publishes alternative scenarios. In the “high immigration” scenario, the U.S. has nearly 22 million more working-age residents in 2050 than in the “low immigration” case.
The U.S. also has another trend working in its favor: Baby boomers are retiring just as their children — sometimes known as the “echo boomers” — are entering their prime working years. Boomers are no longer even the largest age cohort; more of today’s Americans were born in the 1980s and 1990s than in the postwar years. As today’s teens and 20-somethings enter the workforce, they will partly offset their parents’ exit. Indeed, for many young people, mom and dad can’t retire soon enough; some experts argue that boomers, by staying in the workforce longer than past generations, are essentially clogging the usual professional pathways, leaving few opportunities for people beginning their careers.
Thanks in part to the echo boomers, the dependency ratio will flatten out by about 2030. Not that long thereafter, the oldest of the echo boomers will begin entering their own retirement years, and the cycle will begin anew.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)